<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin Becker .net &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/category/computers/operating-systems/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog</link>
	<description>on tech and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Running Zork Games on XP, Vista, Linux, &amp; Mac OS X</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2008/07/01/guides-for-installing-zork-games-on-xpvistalinuxmac-os-x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2008/07/01/guides-for-installing-zork-games-on-xpvistalinuxmac-os-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videogames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2004, I wrote a guide for getting the game Zork Grand Inquisitor running on Windows XP. The game didn&#8217;t work well without the guide because it was originally designed for Windows 98. I&#8217;ve been a fan of the Zork series for almost 10 years now. After receiving a message from another Zork fan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2004, I wrote a <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~infernofilecabinet4/XpSetupsU_Z/Guest/zorkgi.htm">guide</a> for getting the game <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zork_Grand_Inquisitor">Zork Grand Inquisitor</a> running on Windows XP. The game didn&#8217;t work well without the guide because it was originally designed for Windows 98. I&#8217;ve been a fan of the Zork series for almost 10 years now. After receiving a message from another Zork fan in regards to that guide I wrote, I decided that it was time to look into the games again. With a few changes, the more modern games in the series are supported under Windows XP and possibly Vista. That&#8217;s when I had an idea. With <a href="http://www.winehq.org">Wine</a>, <a href="http://www.dosbox.com">DOSBox</a> and <a href="http://frotz.homeunix.org/frotz/">Frotz</a>, it should be possible to run any Zork game on Linux and Mac OS X too. With that, it becomes feasible to run any game in the Zork series on any major operating system. That&#8217;s a big task. I began a project to work on making that idea a reality. I&#8217;m not alone though. I&#8217;m receiving some help and hosting from DAT, the maintainer of the only Zork website still active, <a href="http://www.thezorklibrary.com">The Zork Library</a>.</p>
<p>The guides are currently at <a href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/zorkguides">http://www.kevinbecker.net/zorkguides</a> and will soon be hosted on <a href="http://www.thezorklibrary.com">http://www.thezorklibrary.com</a> as well. The project is a work in progress and needs help on the configurations I can&#8217;t test myself, mainly Mac OS X and Vista. Help with writing the guides and testing them, as well as comments and questions would be greatly appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2008/07/01/guides-for-installing-zork-games-on-xpvistalinuxmac-os-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Functional Programming from Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/11/11/functional-programming-from-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/11/11/functional-programming-from-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/11/11/functional-programming-from-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ars Technica reports that Microsoft will be bringing a functional programming lanaguage to Visual Studio, called F#. The language is a functional langugage that is based on OCaml and will of course link in with .Net. I find this very interesting. Learning different programming paradigms (like procedural, object-oriented, functional, structured, logic and so on) is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071023-microsoft-to-push-functional-programming-into-the-mainstream-with-f.html">Ars Technica reports that Microsoft will be bringing a functional programming lanaguage to Visual Studio, called F#</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F_Sharp_programming_language">The language</a> is a functional langugage that is based on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml">OCaml</a> and will of course link in with .Net.</p>
<p>I find this very interesting. Learning different programming paradigms (like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_programming">procedural</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented">object-oriented</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming">functional</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_programming">structured</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_programming">logic</a> and so on) is a good thing for programmers to do. I see this as a good thing that Microsoft is encouraging functional programming. My favorite lesser-known programming language is Scheme, another functional programming language.</p>
<p>One of the problems with less popular programming lanaguages (the popular ones are usually only procedural, structural or object-oriented languages) is that there are few libraries to support them so its hard to actually do something useful. Microsoft linking F# to .Net will be benefitial to the Windows world by bringing the power of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework">.Net</a> (and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29">Mono</a>, in a way) to functional programming. I have a feeling that <a href="http://labs.live.com/">Microsoft Live Labs</a> has something to do with this and did it so they can do cool projects that take advantage of functional programming paradigms.</p>
<p>This news just shows yet again how unpredictable Microsoft is because of its size. Some parts of it are making <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista">blunder</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Zune">after</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Genuine_Advantage">blunder</a> while others keep <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbon_%28computing%29">doing</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynth">tons</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360">of</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_live">amazing</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_Live_Arcade">things</a> like this.</p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 8px">Blogged with <a href="http://www.flock.com/blogged-with-flock" title="Flock" target="_new">Flock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/11/11/functional-programming-from-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Old Software</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is mainly for myself, but I think others could benefit as well. For my music listening needs (on Windows), I always use Winamp. But not just any Winamp. I&#8217;ve found that Winamp has become quite bloated with feature creep over the last few years. Winamp 2 was the peak of Winamp-y goodness. Winamp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is mainly for myself, but I think others could benefit as well. For my music listening needs (on Windows), I always use Winamp. But not just any Winamp. I&#8217;ve found that Winamp has become quite bloated with feature creep over the last few years. Winamp 2 was the peak of Winamp-y goodness. Winamp 3 and now Winamp 5 just add too much extra junk I don&#8217;t need. So this post is just a way for me to keep a little archive of the bare essentials I need from Winamp. This includes the <a href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/winamp-281/" rel="attachment wp-att-17" title="Winamp 2.81">installer for Winamp 2.81</a> and the skin <a href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/receiver/" rel="attachment wp-att-18" title="Receiver">Receiver</a> by Fli7e. Both these files are now hard to find. Places like <a href="http://www.winampheaven.net">Winamp Heaven</a> and <a href="http://www.oldversion.com">Old Version</a> have the installer and I found <a href="http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/chancers/rskin.htm">this website</a> with the skin, but I don&#8217;t know how much longer they will be around, so I&#8217;ve decided to make an archive of my own. Plus it&#8217;s easier for me to find than googling! Enjoy the old school Winamp goodness!</p>
<p>Direct Downloads:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/winamp281.exe" title="Winamp 2.81">Winamp 2.81</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/receiver.zip" title="Receiver">Receiver Skin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kevinbecker.net/blog/2007/04/07/of-old-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->